Skeptical Science

Site details
Site thumbnail http://www.skepticalscience.com

Scientific skepticism is a healthy thing. Scientists should always challenge themselves to expand their knowledge, improve their understanding and refine their theories. Yet this isn't what happens in global warming skepticism. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports anthropogenic global warming and yet eagerly, even blindly embrace any argument, op-ed piece, blog or study that refutes global warming. So Skeptical Science gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

This site's authorities across Technorati:
Authority icon small
Green Authority: 180
Rank: 144
Authority icon small
Science Authority: 146
Rank: 135
Writers:
 

Recent blog post

  1. Help close the consensus gap using social media

    Over the last few days, there has been intense interest in our consensus paper and The Consensus Project website . The fact that the paper has been reported widely in mainstream media across the world is an important step towards reducing the gaping chasm...

    2 days ago

Recent Influential Reactions

  1. About the SkS Study That Finds a 97% Consensus
    9 hours ago in
  2. Study Finds 97% Consensus on Human-Caused Global Warming in the Peer-Reviewed Literature
    10 hours ago in
  3. Climate Denial's Death Knell: 97 Percent of Peer-Reviewed Science Confirms Manmade Global Warming, Consensus Overwhelming
    10 hours ago in
  4. Cook, et al. The prequel, the teeth gnashing, the recursive fury
    10 hours ago in
  5. WMO Annual Climate Statement Confirms 2012 as Among Top Ten Warmest Years
    10 hours ago in
    6. Reactions are links to this blog from other blogs' posts. Search for more reactions to Skeptical Science.

User reviews

Personal attacks are NOT allowed
Please read our comment policy