Skeptical Science

Site details
Site thumbnail http://www.skepticalscience.com

Scientific skepticism is a healthy thing. Scientists should always challenge themselves to expand their knowledge, improve their understanding and refine their theories. Yet this isn't what happens in global warming skepticism. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports anthropogenic global warming and yet eagerly, even blindly embrace any argument, op-ed piece, blog or study that refutes global warming. So Skeptical Science gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

This site's authorities across Technorati:
Authority icon small
Green Authority: 180
Rank: 144
Authority icon small
Science Authority: 146
Rank: 135
Writers:
 

Recent blog post

  1. Help close the consensus gap using social media

    Over the last few days, there has been intense interest in our consensus paper and The Consensus Project website . The fact that the paper has been reported widely in mainstream media across the world is an important step towards reducing the gaping chasm...

    2 days ago

Recent Influential Reactions

  1. Another Week of Anthropocene Antics, May 5, 2013
    36 minutes ago in
  2. Minnesota Lawmaker Calls Climate Change a “United Nations Fraud”
    56 minutes ago in
  3. Cook's unreported finding
    1 hour ago in
  4. Zombie climate sceptic theories survive only in newspapers and on TV | Graham Readfearn
    1 hour ago in
  5. 99 One-Liners Rebutting Denier Talking Points — With Links To The Full Climate Science
    1 hour ago in
    6. Reactions are links to this blog from other blogs' posts. Search for more reactions to Skeptical Science.

User reviews

Personal attacks are NOT allowed
Please read our comment policy