4 blog reactions to http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3414.html

Leahy (VT), Levin (MI), Mikulski (MD), Murray (WA), Reed (RI), Sarbanes (MD), Stabenow (MI), Wellstone (MN), Wyden (OR), plus Sen. Chafee (RI) and Jeffords (VT). Not Feinstein, not Clinton. Sorry, Clinton lost me there. As for Obama, I hate to quote Politoco, but that parag sums up my feelings rather well: Obama's opposition to the Iraq war in 2003 is unquestioned. But what was a sharp anti-war line on the campaign trail in 2004 - when he said he favored voting against funding the war - turned into a more

And the fact that his campaign accused former President Clinton of bigotry for pointing out that Obama's claim of being adamantly opposed to the Iraq invasion was a fairy tale in light of comments made in 2004 by the Democratic Senate hopeful and now presidential candidate that immediately negated any initial hostility of going to war, certainly did not endear the junior Illinois senator any... The Democratic party is at a historical crossroad of an

November 10, 2007 Read More: Hillary Clinton Another plant? Fox reports on another planted question. AND: Not to brag -- actually, I feel like an idiot for not having made the connection earlier -- but I first reported this same incident in Politico on April 3: On a two-day swing through eastern Iowa this week, Clinton has put the idea of a confrontation with Bush on Iraq – and the implicit distinction between her and Obama

Fox just reported another incident from earlier this year. More to come... Here's the story. AND: Not to brag -- actually, I feel like an idiot for not having made the connection earlier -- but I first reported this incident in Politico on April 3: On a two-day swing through eastern Iowa this week, Clinton has put the idea of a confrontation with Bush on Iraq – and the implicit distinction between her and Obama