2 blog reactions to blog.washingtonpost.com/rawfisher/2008/05/pants_update_pants_man_sues_ci.html

embarrassed himself -- and lawyers everywhere -- with his silly suit. Much as you'd like to think that was the reason for his termination, the reality is that it had very little to do with it. As Marc Fisher, the man for all things Pearson, notes, in Pants Update: Pants Man Sues City: Actually, as those involved in the decision not to renew his tenure on the court told it at the time, the notoriety around Pearson's pants adventure was what made it harder to oust him. The decision makers said that they had plenty of cause not to

of hell because our justice system didn’t just laugh this case out of court like it should have. In fact, check out this video of them telling their story. Rayne also notes that Pearson “even lost his job over [the lawsuit].” But now Pearson has filed a $1 million suit against the District of Columbia for firing him. Maybe Rayne should represent him. ShareThis