40 blog reactions to blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/09/21/bush_clinton_will_be_democrati.html

corps, and it is one of the secrets of the Republicans’ success. Reporters mechanically grope for the ‘middle,’ but when one party is veering rightward, the middle is, too.” Here is Chait’s first chapter. Bush’s Political Prognostication Peter Baker blogged for washingtonpost.com on Friday that Bush isn’t betting against Hillary Clinton: “At an off-the-record lunch a week ago, Bush expressed admiration for her tenacity in the campaign. And he left some in the room with the impression that he

dès 2002 et il veut un plan de retrait rapide. La sénatrice qui était pour, persiste à ne pas reconnaître son erreur et table sur un plan de retrait partiel. George W. Bush a tout de même sous entendu qu'elle continuerait sa politique en Irak (article du Washington Post). Cet écart permanent lui est reproché par les citoyens et à fortiori par les sympathisants de gauche. Deux, la couverture santé universelle. Il sont tous les deux pour, mais Hillary Clinton est tiède et plutôt vague. Elle laisse le souvenir de

in recent elections, as in all other regions of the country. Penn said the trend indicates that Clinton would be a stronger Democratic presidential candidate in the South than either Al Gore was in 2000 or John Kerry was in 2004. . . . Related Bush to Hillary Clinton: I’m Truman, You’re Ike

, whose foreign policy was deeply unpopular in his time but is now recalled as far-sighted and sage. Now Bush is stretching the comparison still further beyond the historical pale." After (Dem strategist?) Dubya hints that a forthcoming Clinton presidency will play Ike to his Truman, Slate's Fred Kaplan cries foul. If the next prez channels Eisenhower, Kaplan contends, "it would be not as a continuation of Bush's Truman but rather as a reversal of Bush's Dulles."

Democrats bowing and scraping before the President over the past few weeks. If Hillary Clinton gets elected, it will lead to a continuation of Bush’s policies. I should mention that this is not something that I read in Counterpunch, but that I heard straight from the horse’s mouth: As Bush was describing his thinking about Iraq and the future, he indicated he wants to use his final 16 months to stabilize Iraq enough and redefine the U.S. mission there so that the next president, even a Democrat, would feel politically able to

response by some on the right to an ad that they are obviously pleased to have the chance to rail against, particularly insofar as it gives them an opportunity to turn "discussions of substance into arguments over etiquette." 'I'm Truman, You're Ike

response by some on the right to an ad that they are obviously pleased to have the chance to rail against, particularly insofar as it gives them an opportunity to turn "discussions of substance into arguments over etiquette." 'I'm Truman, You're Ike