6 blog reactions to www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/19/is-a-microhoobook-in-your-future/

I thought I’d coined “MicroHooBook” but Matt   had done that  a full hour before. Just a moment, just a moment…. looks like The 463 had it before Matt.   Originality sure isn’t what it used to be… Microsoft is certainly working with Yahoo now to try to buy a piece of the company

I thought I’d coined “MicroHooBook” but Matt   had done that  a full hour before. Just a moment, just a moment…. looks like The 463 had it before Matt.   Originality sure isn’t what it used to be… Microsoft is certainly working with Yahoo now to try to buy a piece of the company

And then Yahoo can get down to the brass tacks of making their content more platformy and valuable. Then there’s the even more annoying rumors of Microsoft snapping up the rest of Facebook. I’ve even seen some rumors that the purchase could be valued at $20 billion! That is, Facebook got a raise of $5 billion (33%) between now and when Microsoft first invested. All that despite the fact that Facebook still can’t make money. I don’t think even Microsoft is dumb enough to buy into social networking at that

to describe the merger, and blogged a post with MicroHooBook in the title.    So understandably today when I read Matt Ingram’s MicroHooBook post   I first thought “Hey, Matt stole my cleverly coined word without even a link back!”.    But after a bit of Googling and timestamping research I learned he wrote his post a full hour or more before mine!   Yikes - he probably thinks I was the

to describe the merger, and blogged a post with MicroHooBook in the title.    So understandably today when I read Matt Ingram’s MicroHooBook post   I first thought “Hey, Matt stole my cleverly coined word without even a link back!”.    But after a bit of Googling and timestamping research I learned he wrote his post a full hour or more before mine!   Yikes - he probably thinks I was the

+ Discussion: mathewingram.com/work