9 blog reactions to lessig.org/blog/archives/003570.shtml

Ai quali aggiungerei la critica di Geert Lovink (Zero Comments: Blogging and Critical Internet Culture, Oxford, Routledge, 2007, recentemente tradotto in italiano per Bruno Mondadori) e quella di Lawrence Lessig (in particolare The Ethics of Web 2.0: YouTube vs. Flickr, Revver, Eyespot, blip.tv, and even Google).

The sharing is in the mixing In the past YouTube has been accused of being a “fake sharing” site as it doesn’t provide the tools to remix video. A “true sharing” site doesn’t try to exercise ultimate control over the content it serves. It permits, in other words, content to move as users choose.

site as it doesn’t provide the tools to remix video. A “true sharing” site doesn’t try to exercise ultimate control over the content it serves. It permits, in other words, content to move as users choose. - Lawrence Lessig In February 2007 Adobe launched online editing tools with Photobucket - Tim O’Reilly blogss about it: I love that in addition to “slide shows,” “order prints”, and “share album,” photobucket now will add

as a user/contributor, the more your rights as the producer are respected. Openness of the platform doesn’t have to be an ethical choice, BTW - it could be a sound business choice too, see my summarizing remark on Blip.tv (an interesting read: the “Ethics of Web2.0” posting and the ensuing discussion).

linguagem XHTML pra descrever elos sociais em hiperlinks. esses dados vão acabar se espalhando e adornando nossos amados blogues, bem como nossos perfis virtuais (que poderiam bem se tornar nossas OpenIDs). e o que mais me chamou a atenção no debate levantado na web por diversos intelectuais foi a questão da ética da web2.0, levantada pelo prof. lawrence lessig: alguns sites seguem os princípios da web2.0, especialmente a liberdade da informação, enquanto outros não. o youtube não te deixa baixar os

as a user/contributor, the more your rights as the producer are respected. Openness of the platform doesn’t have to be an ethical choice, BTW - it could be a sound business choice too, see my summarizing remark on Blip.tv (an interesting read: the “Ethics of Web2.0” posting and the ensuing discussion).

, 2005), pp. 40~41을 볼 것. 117) 노엄 촘스키, 같은 글 118) Lawrence Lessig, “The Ethics of Web 2.0:YouTube vs. Flickr, Revver, Eyespot, blip.tv, and even Google”(2006. 10. 20)을 볼 것. http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003570.shtml 119) Tim O'Reilly, “Real Sharing vs. Fake Sharing”(2006. 10. 23)을 볼 것. 원문을 보면 팀 오렐리는 “I’m not sure that Larry’s entirely right about YouTube, but I believe that he's entirely right about the importance of the