Study Finds Stereotyping Has No Relevance in Performance
With the apparent proliferation of information gathered and concluded as basis for further developed criteria, researchers now claim to have alternative basis which invalidates a number of studies. The studies in question proclaim that a (any) stereotype, specifically in terms of this alternative study, “men are better at math” which, in hypothesis, serves to convince some percentage of a distinctly different population (such qualified for purposes of the primary study as being "women"), has major methodological flaws.
Go figure?
David Geary, Curators Professor of Psychological Sciences in the MU College of Arts and Science hypothesizes, “The stereotype theory really was adopted by psychologists and policy makers around the world as the final word, with the idea that eliminating the stereotype could eliminate the gender gap." Relevance would dictate that these theoretical findings are non-reactive as scientifically and mathematically incorrect. In other words, who are these scientists to decide that math exists where indicated? Furthermore, math is not a gender-based activity.
Professor Geary concludes that the alleged findings were inducted erroneously which suggests that the research "utilized improper statistical techniques, and many studies had no scientific evidence of this stereotype."
Specific stereotype aside, should "stereotype threat" be disqualified as not to be stereotypically relevant?
The instrumental research predicts that "stereotype threat" is: "the theory that due to the stereotype that women are worse than men in math skills, females develop a poor self-image in this area, which leads to mathematics underachievement."
According to math, science defines this as non-operative, with math as a basis for these findings, I find:
- Flaw 1: Theoretically, stereotype cannot be determined by gender (gender being philosophy)
- Flaw 2: Females and self-image have no relevance to performance (female being trait-specific, and individualized)
- Flaw 3: Self-image is not dictated outside of one's own understanding of self (self-confidence, not image, would be affected by what one hears from another, and confidence is not what one needs in order to be correct, what one needs is fact)
So, removing the gender-specific stereotype, and using "a (any) stereotype (which is valid under usage, but should not be incorrect through policy) either (can, should, will) lead to underachievement," should have been the hypothesis, although still incorrect, presumably. The basis would be "if heard that it does not exist, does it matter in this moment"... in other words, for purposes of relevance to the primary research: "does suggestion lead to disadvantage, under terms of knowledge." The answer would be, "what we know is not affected by what we hear, unless what we hear is proven to be relevant and willing." This defines eligibility for debate, should one be ... game.
Continued on the next page
Follow Technorati